'flex, 50mm, Kodak HS Ir
Click on the photo to start tagging. Done Tagging

In This Album

551 1391 731 1721 1781 1661 1841 1511 1961 941 1991 2021 2081 1031 2861 2111
'flex, 50mm, Kodak HS Ir
  1. View previous comments... 5 of 6
  2. yooloo
    swan, for a very simple reason: it's a statue.
    they're all - no matter how small or big, light or heavy, airy, hollow, monolithic, moumental or microscopic, even suspended - they're all "grounded". sad thing.
    i decided to leave it as it is. your comment is a huge compliment, and questions like this one make me think more about what i do, and how do i do it.
    if i haven't mentioned it before, all these photos are uncropped, edited to the minimum (contrast, levels, bit of toning...).
  3. mbru65
    One of the best pics yet on the forum! I'll throw in a 5. Fantastic photo!
  4. fpantilimon
    it's a 4.9, ladies and gentelmen!
    great photo!!!!!
  5. Swann
    seems you are right with your opinion about IR shots. It is a sure bet.

    About the base, I really do agree with your answer but wouldn'it look better and more consequent then to show more of the base but this tiny strip?
  6. yooloo
    swanm i told you! any shift from "normal" makes things more interesting. it starts with the film choice, goes on to filters, continues through development, enlargement / scanning... there are so many things one can do to bring the change.
    with IR it's dead easy - click, and the rest is done by nature.
    as for the base - valid point, fully agree with you! i wish i could include more of it, but what you see is the edge of the scann. on the negative one can see good mm or so more, but as i'm still

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice