Hi All,
at the moment we have a SIGMA DP1 at hands. SIGMA-Germany gave it to our MOD team for a test.
Sure, I have to return it ... well ... let us have a first look...
Unfortunately, I do not have acceptable light here at the moment. The weather has been extremely cloudy and rainy over the past days.
Yesterday, I had the chance to take a few shots with this unconventional pocket cam. The picture, which I am going to discuss here, was even taken by my wife .... coincidentally!
Well .... Sigma claim, they have done a pocket, which is capable of doing D-SLR quality shots.
What I can show here is no real comparism to the SD14. I simply neither have acceptable light conditions at the moment ... nor do I have enough time to do such a thing korrectly now ..... but ......
Well, the DP1-shot first: ISO100 / 17mm fixed focal / F: 5.6 / ... 1/80s ...
... as I told ... done by my wife .. who just played around a bit with the DP1 yesterday. Actually, I would have done the shot at eye level hight and would not have cropped the girl's leg without need. Never mind ... it does not really matter now!
Clearly said ... a valid comparism would take the same scene, same focal length same aperture under same light conditions and so forth. What I am just doing now is to compare two shots, which are in a way similar ... not more ...
Now my SD14 shot as comparism ....
SD14 / SIGMA 18-200mm DC OS (@42mm OS ON) / ISO100 / ....1/20s ....
Anyway ... let us crop both shots for a closer look ....
DP1
SD14
Well, the DP1 lens draws sharp as a knife. There cannot be any doubt as far as its image quality is concerned. You really get bilboard-quality with a small pocket cam. It is really fascinating.
On the other hand .... I have always praised SIGMAs 18-200mm ultra-zooms (I have the old one without OS-technology and the DC OS).
Although the 18-200 is fully open here, it does not perform worse than the DP1 fixed fokal lens (which even is slowed down to 5.6 here compared to the OS working at 4.5 fully open.
To sum it up!
DP1's image quality is indisputably the finest a pocket can do. It is comparable to SD SLR results.
The only thing which I am asking myself now is, whether this was a camera for a photographer like me .... I am not quite sure. A D-SLR simply can do an awful lot of things more which a DP1 cannot do.
The question: What could I have done, if I had had my SD14 on the scene??! .... This question might annoy me when analyzing photo results.
See you with nice pictures
Klaus
at the moment we have a SIGMA DP1 at hands. SIGMA-Germany gave it to our MOD team for a test.
Sure, I have to return it ... well ... let us have a first look...
Unfortunately, I do not have acceptable light here at the moment. The weather has been extremely cloudy and rainy over the past days.
Yesterday, I had the chance to take a few shots with this unconventional pocket cam. The picture, which I am going to discuss here, was even taken by my wife .... coincidentally!
Well .... Sigma claim, they have done a pocket, which is capable of doing D-SLR quality shots.
What I can show here is no real comparism to the SD14. I simply neither have acceptable light conditions at the moment ... nor do I have enough time to do such a thing korrectly now ..... but ......
Well, the DP1-shot first: ISO100 / 17mm fixed focal / F: 5.6 / ... 1/80s ...

... as I told ... done by my wife .. who just played around a bit with the DP1 yesterday. Actually, I would have done the shot at eye level hight and would not have cropped the girl's leg without need. Never mind ... it does not really matter now!
Clearly said ... a valid comparism would take the same scene, same focal length same aperture under same light conditions and so forth. What I am just doing now is to compare two shots, which are in a way similar ... not more ...
Now my SD14 shot as comparism ....

SD14 / SIGMA 18-200mm DC OS (@42mm OS ON) / ISO100 / ....1/20s ....
Anyway ... let us crop both shots for a closer look ....
DP1

SD14

Well, the DP1 lens draws sharp as a knife. There cannot be any doubt as far as its image quality is concerned. You really get bilboard-quality with a small pocket cam. It is really fascinating.
On the other hand .... I have always praised SIGMAs 18-200mm ultra-zooms (I have the old one without OS-technology and the DC OS).
Although the 18-200 is fully open here, it does not perform worse than the DP1 fixed fokal lens (which even is slowed down to 5.6 here compared to the OS working at 4.5 fully open.
To sum it up!
DP1's image quality is indisputably the finest a pocket can do. It is comparable to SD SLR results.
The only thing which I am asking myself now is, whether this was a camera for a photographer like me .... I am not quite sure. A D-SLR simply can do an awful lot of things more which a DP1 cannot do.
The question: What could I have done, if I had had my SD14 on the scene??! .... This question might annoy me when analyzing photo results.
See you with nice pictures
Klaus