G
Guest
Irakly, Dirk,
If there is a possibility to download original files, I think the test should be done again.
I need to learn more about the 1Ds. Although we were shooting RAW, I have little experience in processing them afterward. After all, we well know that each camera has its' set of quirks. We are experienced with the ND and I know the Kodak ProBack, but the 1Ds is brand new to me.
I also think a set of shots should be taken of a model, to see how the performance compares with flesh tones. Plus, it would be good to equalize lenses. If I could get a Canon 50/1.4 Prime we could further stabilize the comparisons, then even the 80/2 zeiss on the 645 would be roughly equal. Also, in a couple of weeks I'll have the Kodak 14N to add to the mix.
If there is a possibility to download original files, I think the test should be done again.
I need to learn more about the 1Ds. Although we were shooting RAW, I have little experience in processing them afterward. After all, we well know that each camera has its' set of quirks. We are experienced with the ND and I know the Kodak ProBack, but the 1Ds is brand new to me.
I also think a set of shots should be taken of a model, to see how the performance compares with flesh tones. Plus, it would be good to equalize lenses. If I could get a Canon 50/1.4 Prime we could further stabilize the comparisons, then even the 80/2 zeiss on the 645 would be roughly equal. Also, in a couple of weeks I'll have the Kodak 14N to add to the mix.