As many of you know my experience in medium format is absolutely zero.
As we all know, you could use adaptors to connect lenses for medium format to 35mm cameras. Do you get a better image by using these big lenses ?
In theory, I believe you don't. The MTF performance of medium format lenses are often worse than lenses for 35mm negatives. Medium format produces better image quality, not because you have better lenses, but because you have bigger areas for negatives or sensors.
One of my friend connect his Hassy lens to his Nikon gear, but he said the result is a soft image. This is just one piece of evidence to support my view.
What is your view ? Is it a better or worse image than the ones produced by the 35mm equivalent ?
As we all know, you could use adaptors to connect lenses for medium format to 35mm cameras. Do you get a better image by using these big lenses ?
In theory, I believe you don't. The MTF performance of medium format lenses are often worse than lenses for 35mm negatives. Medium format produces better image quality, not because you have better lenses, but because you have bigger areas for negatives or sensors.
One of my friend connect his Hassy lens to his Nikon gear, but he said the result is a soft image. This is just one piece of evidence to support my view.
What is your view ? Is it a better or worse image than the ones produced by the 35mm equivalent ?