Browsing through the site I saw this article about the Minolta 5400. I have one, and would highly recommend it. It is quite quick when scanning without dust or grain reduction, but then you spend a long time retouching the dust. Using the utilities to remove or control these results in cleaner scans, but a strip of 6 colour negatives can take up to 90 minutes to scan! I always scan at 2700 dpi, giving approximately a 30Mb file. 5400 dpi in unusable as it takes ages, and the files are enormous.
I'm sure the perfectionists would ask why I use colour negative with a Leica. First reason is convenience - I can develop the film, dry-to-dry, in a tank in an hour. I always overdevelop a little. It is MUCH better than black and white, as the Minolta can't use scratch/dust removal with B&W. It's then converted using channels on Photoshop if I want black and white. One thing with colour neg is that it seems to be very tolerant of error, certainly more so than black and white. Never had reticulation, and with an underdeveloped/underexposed neg it was easy to make it into a good print in Photoshop.
Not really interested in slide, as it's too much hassle developing them myself, and they tend to be contrasty. (Love Sensia, though.)
It is a real routine now, to use colour neg with a Leica, and you can tell the results were taken with one! An ex&le is the picture ("singer"), taken at a school function, I am about to post in the photo gallery. It was taken at 4pm and printed by 6pm.