CI Photocommunity

Register a free account now!

If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.

Review Contax T3


...small is beautiful....

In 2001 Contax launched the compact camera T3, the successor of the 10 year old T2. This new model is significant smaller then the T2, has more features and above all a totally new designed 35/2.8 Zeiss lens. Before I go into details about pro and cons of the T3, I have to make some general statements about these kind of compact cameras.

1. Benefits and Limitations of expensive Point and shoot cameras

On the internet, there a are a couple of “it worries me a lot…and for this price…”-comments with the T3 and other expensive so called “point and shoot” cameras. I would like to explain here my personal view about this attitude, just to make sure, that we are on the same planet.

I assume if you are considering buying a Contax T3 or Leica Minilux etc., you do not want to have the most fancy and bargain camera. First of all you want to have an excellent lens. Secondly you want to have a certain build quality and thirdly some nice feature, which make sense if you want to shoot very good pictures and you know something about photography.

So if you just want to have the best price/performance ratio for average day to day photos, Contax or Leica is not the right choice for. Bearing this in mind, you will find with the T3 a very good compromise between size, possible features without being to much loaded of it, an excellent lens and good/reasonable price.

There will be always people who wish additional capabilities, lens ranges etc. But as a manufacturer you can not satisfy everybody. There is no free lunch. Therefore a point and shoot will be always a kind of compromise.

Price and size are very important criteria for a product development. I like the T3 a lot, but obviously it can not have all the features and comfort of an SLR because of its size. So do not expect the viewfinder-size of an RTS III, big user dials (hopefully one for each function) with measurements of 105x63x30,5mm and weight of 230g. This is simply unrealistic!

The more feature you add to a camera, the harder it is to combine them and also to use them, so the more people complain. As with all cameras, the most important question is, whether you will use it. The camera can be as good as it gets, as long as you do not carry it with you, it is useless. This means wasting your money. The best SLR or Rangefinder is useless at home in the closet. With the T3 there is just no excuse anymore, not to have it always with you.

Reflecting the size, Contax did a great job with the T3 viewfinder, features, custom functions, user interface, lens quality, shutter speed, quietness, build quality, filters and accessories and last but not least elegant design.

Although the price seems in the first second not cheap (899 Euro), you pay it mostly for the quality of the lens. The body is more or less a gift on top of it. Compare the prices: a Zeiss G 35/2.0 costs you 669 Euro and the Zeiss MF-SLR 35/2.8, which is a design from the 70s costs 549 Euro. The cheapest Contax body like an Aria or NX costs additional 899 Euro. Of course these are also more capable, but still you have to pay that money just to make one picture with a 35mm Zeiss lens. Since I made test shots with all 3 mentioned lenses and the lens of the T3 is the clear winner, I would call the T3 a bargain (on a Contax/Zeiss and Leitz level).

2. Lens Quality/Picture quality

There are some tests out there, which conclude, that the new Sonnar 35/2.8 on the T3 is the best lens on a point and shoot currently available. Both journals, “Pop Photo” and the German “FotoMagazin” promoted the T3 as their new reference model which means that it must be better then the point and shoots they tested before (i.e. Contax T2, Leica Minilux, Minolta TC-1, Ricoh Gr-1, Nikon 35 etc.).

But nevertheless, you should be always careful with tests of Photo magazines. Therefore I did my own testing with lenses I used over a longer period of time. I did test-shots with a Leica Minilux Zoom, Contax TVS III, Contax G2 with the 35/2.0 Planar and a Contax Aria with the 35/2.8 Sonnar. I did all shots handheld, Fuji Velvia, different apertures etc. on my preferred “testwall” in Frankfurt, which is a graffiti school wall with a lot of different colours and different structures in the material. Of course I did also normal shootings, but this wall gives me always the possibility to have consistent test-parameters.

To make a long story short. The Lens of the T3 is outstanding. It is better then the two point and shoot zooms from Leica and Contax, which is normal. But the big surprise was, that it is also better then the G 35/2.0 and the MF 35/2.8 ! I was really impressed with these results.

But you have also to be aware, that the differences of all the mentioned lenses are not that big. Of course you can see them if you do test-shots always under the same circumstances, but this is not how you normally take pictures. So please bear in mind, that all these lenses are excellent (we are talking here about Leitz und Zeiss levels). But you can see differences on slides with a loupe or with projection and careful inspection.

I would say that Zeiss put basically the latest improvements and knowledge in lens-design into the T3. But because it is a fixed lens and not a zoom, it is also easier to manage this then with the TVS III for ex&le.

The pictures are very sharp, very contrasty, showing also fine details, colour balance is excellent, no flare etc.

Another big surprise is the lack of vignetting. This was achieved with a new designed shutter which guarantees also the higher speed from 1/500 to 1/1200.

There are some advantages with the special construction of the shutter regarding vignetting. I will go more into detail about that in a couple of days I hope. You can Use shutter speed up to 1/500 in Av, and til 1/1200 in P mode. Also more on this later.

3. Size and quality

The T3 is tiny, same appearance as an APS camera. This is for me one of the biggest benefits, because you really can take it everywhere with you without being bothered of the size or weight. Even my girlfriend does not mind to put it in her handbag, because it is so small and light.

But you have to pay attention to handhold it in the right way. Because the T3 is so light (230g), I would recommend faster shutter speeds to ensure that your picture is taken shake free. In this respect I prefer the TVS III. Because of the weight, it gives at least the feeling, you could shoot easier shake-free with 1/60sec. But this is subjective.

The construction is solid and elegant, not to many buttons to press. The material seems to me not purely Titan. It is more a Titan-surface. But I am not sure about this. Overall appearance is for me modest and elegant. Also the Contax name on the front is not to aggressive on the silver version. This is just me, but I do not like to make advertisement for someone else without being paid for it. If you do a lot of street photography, you will also prefer not no be recognized by red dots etc. (at least if you want to keep your camera).

4. Viewfinder

If you wear glasses like me, the viewfinder is not the easiest one to look through. Of course you get used to it, but still you have to turn your head slightly if you want to see everything. Without glasses, there is no problem at all. Because of the tiny size of the T3 I can forgive this, because the benefits of this smaller size outperforms by far the negative points.

The viewfinder is very light, contrasty and ahs no visible distortion. No problems with flare.

You can see the ballpark of the shutterspeeds (500, 125, 30 and LT) and the times in between are stated with parallel lighting of two speeds i.e. 125 and 30 for the 1/60. You can also see flash ready, AF locked, exposure correction warning, Makro (AF distance between 0,35cm and 1m showed with a red tulip) AF Sensor and bright lines for framing.

The bright lines should be just an indication, since the viewfinder lines are showing just 85% of the final picture. It is therefore not important, whether you can see them against bright sunlight etc, as mentioned on other threads about the T3. there will be more on the picture mostly on the right side of the horizontal viewfinder and on the top. So bear this in mind while framing.

5. Autofocus

The T3 can be used with autofocus and also for focusing manually. You can do it manually by pressing the mode button 4 times and then turning the +- wheel for the appropriate distance.

You can do it also with autofocus via AFL Lock buttom or by pressing the shutter half-way down. With autofocus it seems to me that the Contax T3 has 2 different focussing areas (see also manual page 24 bottom and 32 in the upper right corner). When you use AFL lock button to focus, the focusing area is exactly within the 2 brackets (1 oval) which you see in the viewfinder (page 32). This is like a spot-AF.

If you focus the usual way by pressing the shutter halfway down, the focusing area will be bigger, somewhat like 4-5 ovals wide on a horizontal line (page 24). And it seems to be more on the right side, then on the left side of the 2 brackets in the viewfinder. I have to check that with Contax in Hamburg.

Depending on the subject, this causes sometimes wrong focussing results, because the sensor is to big. Unfortunately, you can not program the custom function in a way that you have always the spot AF area also by the usual way of focusing (using the shutter release).

It is also difficult to test this without really shooting one film, because the LCD distance reader on top of the camera just shows the following steps and no numbers in between:0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1m, 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 2m, 3, 5, 10 and InF. With short distances it is not as difficult as with distances over 1m. Because of the DOF of a wide-angle like the Sonnar 35mm, you probably will not see any misfocusing.

For a nice head-shoulder picture it should be o.k., assuming you stop down to 5.6. But for longer distances or wider aperture you easily miss the right point, especially if it is in between 2 other subjects, which might be more the foreground.

Obviously Contax wanted to avoid the typical focusing problems of 2 head shots, focusing exactly in between the 2 people.

The AF in general is different to the older T2 or the Leica Minilux. The T3 is using a passive AF, The T2 and the Minilux are using active AF. Both systems have their pro and cons and there is not one system superior to the other.

I found a very good desription from Joachim Hein of the different AF systems on the internet in the discussion forum. I put it here, assuming that I am not violating any laws, because I could not have explained it better:

Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!

6. User Interface and custom functions

There is always an inherent limitation if you have a very small camera body as it is the case with the T3 regarding the user interface. In my opinion the compromises are well done and I do not miss any comfort. There are some comments on the net from users of the T2 which are missing some of the T2-handlings on the T3. But this is a normal reaction.

You have 2 (small) buttons on the top for flash settings and the selection of different modes. I find the usage very intuitive and self-explaining. With the mode button, you change the settings, which normally stay over a longer period of time in the same position or you do not need that function so often i.e. self-timer, LT, AF/MF and exposure correction.

Since some people like to use the exposure correction more often, even the metering of the T3 is very accurate, this function is on the first place of the mode-levels. I personally would prefer an extra wheel à la TVS III for this, but I could not tell you where to put it on the camera without making it uncomfortable to use.

The handling is easy and fast You just have to push the mode button ‘til you are at the settings you want to change (maximum 4 pushes) and then you turn the +- wheel on the top to change your desired setting..

For the flash exclusive there is the 2nd button, because you are using it more often (fill in flash, red eye reduction, flash off etc. Although both button are small, I do not have any problems in using them.

What I do not like is on the on/off switch the barrier between the P mode and the aperture selection. You have to press first the little silver button in the inner circle of the power switch and –while pressing it down- turning the wheel to the desired aperture. Of course this is not a big deal and I can do it with one hand, I would have preferred not to have this barrier. I am aware that this is risking the change of the P-mode by accident, but I would still prefer it.

You can also reduce the shutter time-lag with custom function CF2:2b. This causes the lens to extend fully to focusing position whenever the shutter is depressed halfway, thus reducing the time required to operate the shutter.

Exposure compensation can be programmed in 1/3 and ½ steps. For all details of the custom functions, please look at the download area. Selftimer 2 and 10 sec.

The lens cover does not look very convincing to me. It could be moved to easy by something hitting or scratching it.

7. Flash

The internal flash is a weak point with the T3. It has a LZ of 6, which is not very much. If you like to shoot with Provia 100F or Velvia, the meter-range is not always satisfying. 2m with 2.8 aperture and ISO 100 and 1m with 5.6 is often not enough. On the other hand a bigger internal flash would have made the body also bigger and needs more battery. Therefore I like the optional flash adapter SA-2, with which you can use the Contax TLA 200 in case I really need a good flash.

8. Accessories

This is also one of the big advantages of the T3. You have really sophisticated accessories. That starts with the flash adapter SA-2 (147 Euro). Once connected to the T3 it feels like one piece. The size is with the adapter approximately the same as the minilux zoom. So do not worry about that. The SA-2 works best with the TLA 200 (249 Euro). You can also connect other flashes on it, but you are loosing the automatic adjustments, which are just possible with the TLA 200 and the SA-2 together. So the results are getting worse. Results with TLA 200 are very good, no red eyes etc. and the LZ of 20 is better than any internal flash of a P&S. With Iso 100 and aperture of 2.8 you get 7m. With aperture 5.6 you get 3,5m. This is for me all I need. Everything is easy pocketable.

Additionally I would recommend the filter adaptor (46 Euro) for attaching 30,5mm filters on to the T3. You need to buy the original filter adapter, because there is no screw in possibility on the T3-lens. Contax offers 5 different filters (31 Euro each), metal hood (25 Euro) and the appropriate hood cover K-34 (25 Euro). It is great to have the possibility to attach filters and lens hood on the T3. This makes it a lot more suitable for serious shootings.

The Contax filters are expensive, but there are also other brands, which are seling 30,5mm filters (B&W, but they are not much cheaper), Helioplan etc. According to the manual do not use 2 filters or one filter and the lens hood at the same time because of vignetting. I heard different experience about that on the net, so I have to test that for myself.

Always check, whether the filters are multicoated.

Summary of most important points

Excellent image quality of the 35/2.8 lens. Better then G or MF-SLR 35mm
Very good build quality
Very good Viewfinder (except if you wear glasses)
Excellent Handling, Size and weight
Very good features and custom functions
Sophisticated Accessories i.e. filters, flash hood, flash adapter etc.
Autofocus not as obvious as it should be
Relatively weak internal flash for ISO 100 or ISO 50 films
Lens cover not convincing
Top shutter speed over 1/500-1/1200 just at aperture 8 or higher

Price/performance ratio "excellent" (899 Euro) - compared to other Contax models



There seems to be a short test in the new Amateur Photographer of the Contax T3 and its peers. It is a comparison between the T3, Leica Minilux, Minolta TC-1, Rollei AFM-35 and Ricoh GR21.

The test is not yet online and I have not received any copy yet. Maybe someone else is a subscriber and can us tell more. I heard the T3 won overall.



> [Yes, there is a group test of 35mm compacts in the current edition of Amateur Photography and the T3 is by some margin the > winner. I quote "One camera in this group coped with every situation. Exposures were consistent, focusing accurate and lens > sharpness excellent. This camera has coped outstandingly with flash outdoors and without flash indoors."]


I duplicated the posting in the Zeiss-lens-section of Joel Stern into the T3 thread because of its relevance for 2 different subjects at the same time:

By Joel Stern on Tuesday, May 21, 2002 - 3:56 am

I have a T3, until then I used, for many years a 35 as my main lens...first on a Canon Ftb with a 100 as my second lens, which saw much less use, later an EOS system with a 35-70 and a 70-210 zoom...felt this system was too bulky. I then purchased a G1 kit with a 35mm F2 and the 200 flash, soon to add the 90mm lens. I have not used this as much as I would have liked, but I have found my my photos to be quite nice.. what has really stolen my interest has been my T3. The lens is wonderful, it is a small and delightful camera..I take it everywhere and the quality of the pictures is just great. So far I have not felt that I am missing much with only this one lens..I have even considered selling the G1, but I will wait a bit...I may sell the 35mm on that or trade for a 45 as I don't think the 35f2 has anything over the T3. For me the 35 has always been about perfect as a general lens, landscapes, candids...I do little work that would necesitate a really long lens.

Joel Stern


I don't recall ever reading in-depth reviews on T2 in the past. Now that T3 is here and has received raving reviews (at least in lens/image quality,) I can't help wondering how much improvement in image quality does it have over T2. I think someone once described it as 'slight (improvement).' Does anyone have experiences with both cameras or have data in terms of resolution and contrast that may allow some subjective/objective comparison to be made ?


Hi Bill,

I was talking with Zeiss in Germany about that. I have never used the T2 myself, so I am relying on these conversations and on MTF charts which I have still to upload in the download section.

The lens of the T3 is clearly better then the one of T2. Contax T1 and T2 have actually the exact same lens, which is a design of 1990. The lens of the T3 was completely new designed and is clearly better than the T1/T2 and also better then the G35 and C/Y35.

Directly compared to the T2 an additional advantage is the construction of the shutter in between the lens. This is reducing vignetting which such a small lens to a minimum.

I am expecting within the next days a description of the exact function of this shutter from Contax Hamburg. I never really understood, how it really works. As soon as I have it, I will translate it and post it here. But this will take some time. Unfortunately I have still a normal job for my living




I just forgot to mention that there is a link in the link section to a thread in

There is a T3 discussion and at the same time a comparison to the T2. The result is in short that the reviewer prefers some handling issues of his old T2 over the T3, but agrees on some improvements of the T3.

Bear in mind that if you are used to a certain handling of a camera, you always tend to see any kind of changes negative, even if it is objectively seen an improvement.

Just my 2 cents



About T2 and T3 comparison:

I am an old user of T2. My first camera dead soon (7 months) because of metering system problem. However, remaining impressed by color, consistence, saturation, "magic environment" and other obvious and unique qualities of the camera, I purchased (june 2000) another new T2. In spite of the insuperable results of a certain number of shoots, it's inexplicable that this camera (I experienced it on three exemplars) offers a high percent of out of focus photos, systematicaly, withouth fail and apparent reason, aprox. 40% in some rolls (I am not a novice and used and am using Reflex and medium format systems).

I am predisposed to purchase the new T3 if this extrain problem is really solved.



Hi Leopoldo,

the AF system of the T3 is totally different to the T2. The T3 is using a "passive AF", the T2 an "active AF". The difference between the two AF-system are desribed in the first review in this T3-thread.

I am using my T3 whenever I do not want to take my SLR with me, which is quiet often. I never had problems with wrong focussing results with the T3, BUT you have to know how/where the AF of the T3 is actually focussing. This is why I put so much effort in describing the difference between the normal AF and the Spot AF of the T3.

With the normal AF (just pressing the shutter-release halfway down)the focussing brackets, which you see in the viewfinder, are actually to small. In reality the AF sensor is bigger as described above. Just with Spot-AF the size of the AF-sensor is identical with the brackets in the viewfinder.

You have to get used to this with the T3. Apart of that, the T3 is an almost perfect camera...



Simon Lamb uploaded some pictures from the party at the palace made with the T3....

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I do not know which film and scanner he was using, but it is looking pretty cool.



Hi Bill,

I updated tonight the download section. There is now a pdf file with the MTF data of the T2 and T3 lenses.

If you compare both, it seems to be obvious that the T3 lens is superior. How much you can see this difference in "real life"?

According to the MTF data you should see a significant improvement of the T3 also in "real life" shootings.



The film for the T3 pictures from the Palace was Kodak Supra 400, scanned on a Nikon LS30.



What is the optimum aperture on the Contax T3 in terms of sharpness? Generally lenses at fully open and closed down apertures aren't at optimum sharpness. If anyone has any ideas about the ContaxT3 I would appreciate it.

Best regards



Even though I have yrs of experience in Photo, I just found this forum and am interested in purchasing my first high end P&S. I have Nikon "F" through "F3T", but never got into AF SLR's. I went to earlier Olympus stylus, because of their glass lens. I halso have a couple of digital's, again Nikon 880, and 2500. My questions are:, my son (adult) will be touring Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand in a few weeks. I am interested in the Contax T3. (Reading great posts) about it. A second thought is the new Rollei 35 AFM. Are they compatable in quality?? seems 100.00 USD difference. Second questions, where in Asia (above) are reputable places, store names, district can he go w/o getting ripped off to purchase for me? Is buying the flash attachment and flash worth it over there? Is the difference in $$ worth the hassle to USA on-line purchase? Good Asia Price? He is third generation Chinese-American w/ no Chinese language skills.



I live in Hong Kong and have bought many cameras from several different shops. For the visitor passing through Hong Kong, I can recommend him to buy a T3 from the Tin Cheung Camera Company located in the Tung Ying Arcade, which is on the same block as the Miramar Hotel in Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui. This shop has good prices, accepts trade-ins, and includes international warranty coverage. Hong Kong has no import duties or sales tax, and the competition between camera shops is fierce, making it a great place to shop for camera gear. However, stay away from the typical "tourist" shops. They often won't observe warranties, and often sell grey imports.

Personally, I bought the Rollei AFM35, and I can confirm that it takes beautiful images. The lens is spectacular, and the handing is nice, although it has a few quirks, as do all the cameras in this class. The Rollei is somewhat larger than the T3, however, and is therefore not as comfortable to hang off one's belt. The T3 is better in that regard.

Good luck.


>Thanks for the information. If I drop by, I'll make the best of it.>--/\--=


Thank you Dirk for the very well done rewiew about the T3.
I own a T3 and really I find the lens very good, in particular the portraits have a very special brilliance...... when they are in focus.
Because, unluckily, not very often they are so. I shooted 5/6 rolls and I have never had, in low light and F 2.8, a portrait in focus.
Like Dirk, I noticed that focusing area is more to the right than to left of the center in high light; but in low light, when is active the auxiliary illuminator, I find that the focusing area is completely shifted on the right of the brackets (from the brackets till 3/4 of the view-finder).
If I have the subjet on the brackets and something else on the right of it and nearer, I can see on the display that the camera always focuses on that.
(It's easy in this way, moving the camera, to individualize exactly the real zone of focusing).
Now I wonder if this is a problem only of my camera or it's a problem of T3 in general.
Could someone do the same test and answer to my question?

Other problem: don't you find that the lens vignettes a little bit too much?
In my landscape the clear blue sky have always the corner sensibly darker than the center, even at F 8.
Best regards and ( I've just finished seeing the football match German-USA) congratulation to the German friends for the qualification.

Paolo Lombardi


1. the soccer game was in my (german) opinion nothing to be proud of for Germany. The US team played better, faster and with more power.

2. I have no vignetting on my T3, so you should check this with Contax. With the shifting of (standard) AF in different light situations, I have to check that on the weekend. But I would be surprised if that would be the case...

My advice would be to use the Spot AF for portraits. Although the DOF is very big anyway because of the wideangel...



I just bought a Contax T3, my first (and hopefully, not last Contax). I can't wait to start shooting with it.
Quick question thought. When I shut it off, the LCD display remains on, showing my the battery strength and how many exposures I have left. Is this normal?