DPR Forum
Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. Whether it is Medium Format, fullframe, APS-C, MFT or smaller formats. Digital or film. DPRF is a forum for everybody and for every format.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
F2AS
- Thread starter mny2002
- Start date
S
shabbir
Used F2A and F2AS for few years. No doubt it is among those cameras of Nikon which brought it into the world of Professionals. It is rugged but due to non-availability of parts and too old specially the meter problem now loosing its worth. Due to eye sight problem I both sold and now happy with F4 but will not forget its ruggedness and built like a tank.
N
n80
Going on vacation, how do I unsubscribe?
S
shabbir
Hi Kian Guan AU
Further to add my posting dated 31st July, 2003, F2A and AS being mechanically can go below fifteen second shutter speed and a very informatory and comprehensive review on www.photo.net by Tom Shea on F2A and an excellent work done on Nikon F2 series machines by Malaysian site www.mir.com will be very useful to visit. Thanks
Further to add my posting dated 31st July, 2003, F2A and AS being mechanically can go below fifteen second shutter speed and a very informatory and comprehensive review on www.photo.net by Tom Shea on F2A and an excellent work done on Nikon F2 series machines by Malaysian site www.mir.com will be very useful to visit. Thanks
S
shabbir
> Hi Kian-Guan Au i am happy with F4 as was with F2AS but eye sight and budget forced/allowed me to buy this gear. i also agree that F4 is like a tank but with latest computerrized circuit and AF too.As to F5 no doubt it is more advanced and sophisticated as compared to F4 but being a traditionalist it is having some blend of mechanical bodies like winding manually and cable release etc. Secondly if one has a bag of money to buy F5. i do not want to enter in the debate of mechanical/auto bodies but in my country unfortunately no service center/authorized repair facility and thus repair problem. Even for F4 CLA i sent to UK. Other gear pentax Z1 which also developed winding problem sent to UK but returned with advise to replace with Z1(P) .Contax 167 Mt had the same problem and disposed on throw away price and now AX is passing through the same process. So the CLICK of mechanical bodies have magic in it and suits to those who are unlucky of not having repair facilities.i am still keeping FM2N as backup but lot of difference in the click of F2AS (a trend setter) and also FM armoured car. with regards gill
I prefer manual/mechanical cameras but I did not know why until I did some soul searching. I was finally able to trace it back to my early photographic experiences when my brand new automatic camera kept breaking on me during my assignments. When my new camera broke, my old backup manual/mechanical camera was always there to save me. As a result, I began to depend more and more on my manual/mechanical camera until I finally came to the conclusion that the manual/mechanical camera was more dependable because of its simple design and fewer moving parts.
Recently, I have begun to rely more on digital cameras because I am able to evaluate my shots immediately and make necessary adjustments. However, the complex design of digital cameras scares me to the point that I feel I cannot depend on them. There are times when I am so afraid my digital will break or run out of battery power in the middle of an assignment that I know I would feel a lot more comfortable using my old dependable standard prism F2 rather than a delicate electronic camera.
Please don’t misunderstand me; I am not saying that all manual/mechanical cameras are better than all automatic/electronic cameras. I am saying that even though I would love to shoot with a Nikon F5 or a Nikon D70 or a Fuji S2; the manual/mechanical Nikon F2 just gives me more peace of mind.
Recently, I have begun to rely more on digital cameras because I am able to evaluate my shots immediately and make necessary adjustments. However, the complex design of digital cameras scares me to the point that I feel I cannot depend on them. There are times when I am so afraid my digital will break or run out of battery power in the middle of an assignment that I know I would feel a lot more comfortable using my old dependable standard prism F2 rather than a delicate electronic camera.
Please don’t misunderstand me; I am not saying that all manual/mechanical cameras are better than all automatic/electronic cameras. I am saying that even though I would love to shoot with a Nikon F5 or a Nikon D70 or a Fuji S2; the manual/mechanical Nikon F2 just gives me more peace of mind.
John
Devices break. Every device eventually will wear out or fail.
Nikon's F series are extremely robust, however, which is why they have been the traditional choice in SRLs for legions of photojournalists for the past half-century. When last used some four years back, my F3 was starting to darken the right side of the frames - obviously a shutter problem developing.
It is now a bit over four years since I bought my first digital camera, the Nikon Cooplpix 990, replaced by the CP5000 about two years ago. Now realize that these cameras make no pretense of having the F-series' robustness. They are high-end prosumer cameras and not made for the rigors of daily photojournalism in the field. None the less, I have had no problems whatever in the tens of thousands of shots over the past four years.
These cameras have completely replaced the Nikons and the Leicas. However, for top quality I still shoot medium format - as manual as you can get. There too, shutters in lenses need maintenance. A few years back all three lenses for my Linhof technical camera went for cleaning and calibration, and I just picked up my 150mm Bronica ETR lens after the shutter stopped working.
Manual is no guarantee of robustness, nor are complex cameras necessarily less reliable. The little Nikon digital cameras have allowed me to shoot in situations I would not even think of were I using film. Once you have conquered their formidable learning curve, incredible possibilites present themselves to you. In all my decades of photography, nothing has even approached being as liberating as digital.
Digital and medium format work beautifully side by side. Everything I would have shot with 35mm in the past is now shot digitally. Any time I travel, do architecture or epic landscapes, I have my medium format arsenal. Yesterday, I was shooting with both my digital and a WideLuxe 140° panoramic that uses 35mm film, but shoots a negative 6cm wide.
I use Epson's breakthrough scanner, the 4870 for panoramic and medium format images and the prints are superb. Finally a flatbed that does film quite well. With digital and the scanner, I have complete control of all my images from concept to presentation, no matter the source. My prints are only distinguishable from those I made in my colour lab years back, by the fact that they are so consistently good. A run of the mill first print from my digital darkroom is the equal of a portfolio print I spent a day making back then.
Your piece of mind is very costly. You have both missed many images and much pleasure by restricting yourself in this way. Much has happened in photography in the decades since the F2 came on the market, and these instruments greatly extend one's reach in image acquisition.
I shoot with the highest of tech and the lowest of tech - each has its place. Check my web-site and I am sure you will "get it". Obviously, these images are not the product of a worried mind. The choice of camera is not dictated by whether the thing will break on the shoot, but by the needs of the subject matter - which is the ONLY consideration.
I also sleep very well, indeed no matter what I shot with on a given day.
larry!
ICQ 76620504
http://www.larry-bolch.com/
Devices break. Every device eventually will wear out or fail.
Nikon's F series are extremely robust, however, which is why they have been the traditional choice in SRLs for legions of photojournalists for the past half-century. When last used some four years back, my F3 was starting to darken the right side of the frames - obviously a shutter problem developing.
It is now a bit over four years since I bought my first digital camera, the Nikon Cooplpix 990, replaced by the CP5000 about two years ago. Now realize that these cameras make no pretense of having the F-series' robustness. They are high-end prosumer cameras and not made for the rigors of daily photojournalism in the field. None the less, I have had no problems whatever in the tens of thousands of shots over the past four years.
These cameras have completely replaced the Nikons and the Leicas. However, for top quality I still shoot medium format - as manual as you can get. There too, shutters in lenses need maintenance. A few years back all three lenses for my Linhof technical camera went for cleaning and calibration, and I just picked up my 150mm Bronica ETR lens after the shutter stopped working.
Manual is no guarantee of robustness, nor are complex cameras necessarily less reliable. The little Nikon digital cameras have allowed me to shoot in situations I would not even think of were I using film. Once you have conquered their formidable learning curve, incredible possibilites present themselves to you. In all my decades of photography, nothing has even approached being as liberating as digital.
Digital and medium format work beautifully side by side. Everything I would have shot with 35mm in the past is now shot digitally. Any time I travel, do architecture or epic landscapes, I have my medium format arsenal. Yesterday, I was shooting with both my digital and a WideLuxe 140° panoramic that uses 35mm film, but shoots a negative 6cm wide.
I use Epson's breakthrough scanner, the 4870 for panoramic and medium format images and the prints are superb. Finally a flatbed that does film quite well. With digital and the scanner, I have complete control of all my images from concept to presentation, no matter the source. My prints are only distinguishable from those I made in my colour lab years back, by the fact that they are so consistently good. A run of the mill first print from my digital darkroom is the equal of a portfolio print I spent a day making back then.
Your piece of mind is very costly. You have both missed many images and much pleasure by restricting yourself in this way. Much has happened in photography in the decades since the F2 came on the market, and these instruments greatly extend one's reach in image acquisition.
I shoot with the highest of tech and the lowest of tech - each has its place. Check my web-site and I am sure you will "get it". Obviously, these images are not the product of a worried mind. The choice of camera is not dictated by whether the thing will break on the shoot, but by the needs of the subject matter - which is the ONLY consideration.
I also sleep very well, indeed no matter what I shot with on a given day.
larry!
ICQ 76620504
http://www.larry-bolch.com/