Zeiss Mirotar 500/f4.5

[antonyb]

ok thanks guys. i'd love something like the EF 16-35 F2.8L but as i use a 20D the crop factor would mean that i end up with pretty much the same lens i already have, (in terms of range at least). I have an EF75-300IS and have to say, so far I have been pretty dissapointed! its making me wonder whether the jump upto the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS should be made. any thoughts on either of those two lenses?



antony

 

[antonyb]

talking of good canon glass...

https://secure.ffordes.com/Shop/Store/Itemdet.asp?Type=secd&sub=1&Code=CN&SubCode=AL&id=54880&promo=0

FYI

 

[bobbytan]

Antony, if you are shooting with a 20D you should get the 10-22 because even though it may not be as sharp as either the 16-35L or 17-40L, it's still very decent and better than the 3rd party options.

I've never had or used the 100-400L but those who own it all say it's a very sharp lens. Check out the FM user reviews on this lens.